130%), but the variations in the light and heavy scores were insignificant, and the lower-scoring 16-core component entirely destroyed the server score’s 8-core piece. The two Raptor Lake ES portions previously addressed had an average bench difference of 4% (134% vs. There is still more damning evidence that there is an issue here. Although UserBenchmark seems to be less concerned with multi-core domination when producing its benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is still significantly better than the Raptor Lake sample in normal and heavy, but only improves by 1% in average bench score. ![]() The scores for Raptor Lake ES, which received a 134%, are as follows: Heavy: 164% normal: 139% server: 117%. When tested with an ASRock X670E Pro RS motherboard, the Ryzen 9 7900X achieved these individual section percentages for an overall average bench of 135%: Regular (1-core and 2-core): 150% Heavy (4-core and 8-core): 185% Server (64-core): 223%. It’s noteworthy to note that a couple of Raptor Lake engineering samples have been located on UserBenchmark, one of which generated a bench average of 134%, which was equally impressive. The main competition for Zen 4 is the upcoming 13th-gen Raptor Lake series, not Intel’s 12th-gen Alder Lake CPUs. ![]() Therefore, in this particular run, the 12-core Zen 4 processor is already a staggering 18% in front of the Ryzen 7000 processor. On the average bench chart, the Ryzen 5 7600X is now in second place with 117%, followed by the Intel Core i9-1200KS with 115%. This truth must be made clear right away: UserBenchmark is renowned in the benchmarking community for its blatant and well-documented bias against Intel components. We get bandwidths for the benchmark of 1494.8 GB/s for memory read, 1445.7 GB/s for memory write, and 1476.6 GB/s for memory copy, with a latency of 10.1 ns.v
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |