If negative mass exists, then these interpretations are also possibly broken. However, since you need negative energy to move faster than the speed of light, which already breaks our understanding of physics, it's dangerous to actually rely on these interpretations. According to some of our math, you should be able to teleport, or move back in time if you can 'warp' faster than the speed of light. Not 'travelling instantly to a destination' like in video games or teleporters. Warping here means 'moving because of how we affect the space around us'. A warp drive is a thing that allows you to move through space, not because it's pushing exhaust around like a rocket, but because it's warping the space around it in a shiny and convenient way.WHAT IS A "PHYSICAL" WARP DRIVE (as opposed the the usual 'theoretical' warp drives like the Alcubierre drive)? You can also travel at the speed of light if you have access to infinite energy according to known physics. This is kind of what you would expect as a physicist, and is still bad news for the concept of a warp drive, but it's not controversial.We'd still need to find and collect matter that spins all known physics on its head to be able to travel faster than the speed of light. Not "this is possible if you can find a thing with negative mass". Usually when we run in to negative masses in equations, we interpret it to mean "this isn't possible". Moving faster than the speed of light still definitely requires something referred to as negative energy, or negative mass objects- which we still don't think exist.Read the original paper through, here are the upshots in TLDR fashion:ĬAN WE TRAVEL FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT YET (no) WHY NOT Recommended Linksįor a list of related subreddits, hover over top menu. One of the fundamental assumptions in future(s) studies is that the future is plural rather than singular, that is, that it consists of alternative future(s) of varying degrees of likelihood but that it is impossible in principle to say with certainty which one will occur. If history studies our past and social sciences study our present, what is the study of our future? Future(s) Studies (colloquially called "future(s)" by many of the field's practitioners) is an interdisciplinary field that seeks to hypothesize the possible, probable, preferable, or alternative future(s). Content older than 6 months must have in the titleįor details on moderation procedures, see the.Support original sources - avoid blogs/websites that are primarily rehosted content.Titles must accurately and truthfully represent the content of the submission.Submissions with in the title have stricter post length and quality guidelines Avoid generalized invitations to discuss frequently discussed topics. Text posts need to encourage in-depth and detailed discussion.Avoid posting content that is a duplicate of content posted within the last 7 days.Submissions and comments of accounts whose combined karma is too far in the negatives will be removed.Account age: >1 day to comment, >5 days to submit content.Comments that dismiss well-established science without compelling evidence are a distraction to discussion of futurology and may be removed. Comments must be on topic, contribute to the discussion and be of sufficient length.Bots require moderator permission to operate. This also includes promoting any content in which you have any kind of financial or non-financial stake. No spamming - this includes polls and surveys.No memes, reaction gifs or similarly low effort content.We want this submission statement to elaborate on the topic being posted and suggest how it might be discussed in relation to the future. All posts must have an initial comment, a Submission Statement, that suggests a line of future-focused discussion for the topic posted. Be respectful to others - this includes no hostility, racism, sexism, bigotry, etc.New to reddit? click here! Welcome to r/FuturologyĪ subreddit devoted to the field of Future(s) Studies and evidence-based speculation about the development of humanity, technology, and civilization. Nanotech - Robotics - Society - Space - Transport Source Quality: excellent good ok avoid C A T E G O R I E SģD Printing - Artificial Intelligence - BiotechĬomputing - Economics - Energy - Environment
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |